You already trust 42Crunch to govern what ships to production. That governance model — specify, audit, scan, protect — is the same one that now covers MCP. Nothing about how you work with us changes; what you get coverage for does.
If budget shifted toward AI tooling before you got to finish rolling out API governance everywhere you wanted to, that's fine — the contracts, SQGs, and CI/CD pattern you already have in place for REST and GraphQL are the exact foundation MCP governance reuses. Extending coverage to MCP is a configuration change, not a new platform to learn.
| Platform login | Same account, same dashboard |
| API key | Same key authenticates MCP tooling |
| CI/CD pattern | Same pipeline step shape — poll a gate, pass or block |
| SQG concept | Same minimum-score-threshold model |
| MCP Contract | Auto-generated from a live MCP server URL |
| MCP Audit | Content-threat analysis — prompt injection, tool poisoning, exfiltration |
| MCP Scan | Live protocol probing + fuzzing against your MCP server |
| New SQG | A second gate, scoped to your MCP servers, alongside your existing API gates |